About

All answers to the BIG questions or Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Life But Were Afraid to Ask.
Wee gee! What does that mean, besides the cross-references to Woody Allen and to the Philosopher’s Attic©?
Hey pal, do you really think you’ll give all the answers to the BIG questions? How did you came by such a bombastic idea of a blog?
Curieux curieux… Si vous me permettez cette incartade dans le monde des petites questions, je vais articuler mes réponses comme suit: pourquoi ce blog? que sont ces questions importantes que je me pose à moi-même, qu’on me pose, ou qui ne sont que le résultat de mon délire et, Pourquoi y répondre ? Tout cela n’est-il qu’un exutoire sans pareil pour ma folie lancinante ?
Now, as you may have noticed first, in this blog, everything is bilingual. Pas traduit, mais bilingue… just another way to have fun. But, to your relief, I’ll try to write a whole post only in English or in French, but not mix them, to make things easier for people who don’t know one or the other language.
Why this blog? To answer this is not an easy task… You must first know that I have an absolute lack of will with all things concerning computers, considering it my first public ennemy. Bien que cet outil merveilleux m’ait souvent facilité ma vie professionnelle (bases de données, échanges d’informations, etc.), il trouve toujours le bon moyen de me faire perdre un temps fou en bug, problèmes et consorts. BUT… my wife is a sort of computer geek, who loves all this computing and data processing… you may understand the consequences of our relationship by yourself… as I don’t want us to turn to some Mil and Margret, I decided to give up and open this blog… but, as I am a fool, not an idiot, I urge her to an agreement: I’ll do the writing, she’ll do the design (heheh)… et maintenant voilà le résultat: Hunk of Junk.
En ce qui concerne « Toutes les réponses aux questions importantes ou tout ce que vous avez toujours voulu savoir sur la vie sans jamais oser le demander », et ce qui les lie au Hunk of Junk, littéralement un tas d’ordure, c’est finalement assez trivial: les questions importantes ne sont pas toujours celles que l’on croit et l’on peut y répondre parfois plus aisément que ce que l’on aurait pensé de premier abord – de plus, je ne vais pas y répondre à toutes en une seule fois (je suis peut-être fou, mais je ne suis pas malade). Of course such questions as Why are we here? What’s life all about? Is God really real, or is there some doubt? What’s the point of all this hoax? are big questions alright, but are they really BIG? Besides the fact that all those questions were already answered in the Monty Python’s movie The Meaning of Live in 1983, I’m not sure those are really the important ones… as Virginia Woolf said in The Common Reader, « Let us not take it for granted that life exists more fully in what is commonly thought big than in what is commonly thought small », and sometimes small.. is really BIG… and answers are sometimes needed, and without delay… si vous voulez savoir exactement ce que cela veut dire, je ne peux que vous inviter à lire Hunk of Junk…
Si vous voulez me contacter / if you want to contact me: laissez votre message / leave your message ICI / HERE

Disclaimer
Hunk of Junk is a 100% non-profit site. You may not use or reproduce any artwork, pictures or content without making a link to the site, picture or to the post concerned.
Hunk of Junk reserves also the right to delete, move or edit the messages or comments. Any user is responsible for the content of their messages. However, by submitting comments or messages to Hunk of Junk you are granting us a royalty free non-exclusive licence to reproduce, modify, translate, make available, distribute the Message in whole or in part and in any form. Concerning the pictures on my site:
In the Header:
The Calvin and Hobbes comic strip is the property of Bill Watterson. I scanned it from my own copy of The Complete Calvin and Hobbes, published by Andrews McMeel.
The caption picture is the property of Stanley Kubrick and Columbia Pictures. I took it from my own copy of Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb.
In the Side bar:
The picture taken through a window of the summer palace in Beijing is my property. I took it.
In the About page:
The Peanuts image is the property of Charles M. Schulz. I scanned it from my own copy of The Complete Peanuts, published by Fantagraphics Books.
In the Home page:
The picture of the shoe is the property of J. M. Weston, ’cause they made the shoe in question.
The picture of King Lear and his fool is under the Clipart ETC License, copyright by the University of South Florida.
The Shadock image is the property of Jacques Rouxel and the A.A.A. (Animation Art graphique Audiovisuel). I took it from their site.
The picture of the Salève is my property, as I also took it.
The phrenologychart is in the public domain, its copyright has expired.
The pictures of the influenza are in the public domain, because they are ineligible for copyright.
The cosmological schema is taken from the Liber de naturis rerum written by Thomas de Cantiprato probably in the beginning of the Thirteen century and therefore its copyright has expired.
I don’t remember if I took the picture of the gargoyle of the cathedral Notre-Dame de Paris or if I scanned it from a postcard… really… I remember walking around the towers and taking a lot of pictures, but cannot recall…
The picture of the “Envy” is a reproduction of an illustration by Frederick Barnard made for The pilgrim’s progress from this world to that which is to come by John Bunyan, Strahan and Company, London 1880 and its copyright has expired.
All the shaving pictures are my property, I took them and the stuff is mine too.
All the pictures in the Gallery are my property.
